Review



human cd80 fc  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems human cd80 fc
    Human Cd80 Fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 11 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/us12503510-901-30-34?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 11 article reviews
    human cd80 fc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    R&D Systems human cd80 fc
    Human Cd80 Fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/us12503510-901-30-34?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human cd80 fc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems human b7 1
    Human B7 1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/us12326457-298-56-58?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human b7 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems human cd80 fc chimera
    Human Cd80 Fc Chimera, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/pm40266234-57-18-21?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human cd80 fc chimera - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    R&D Systems human soluble b7
    Human Soluble B7, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/pm38422671-65-0-18?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human soluble b7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    R&D Systems human cd80
    Human Cd80, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/us11858997-2232-9-19?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human cd80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    R&D Systems human recombinant b7
    Human Recombinant B7, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/pmc10154808-35-30-41?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human recombinant b7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems recombinant human b7 1
    Recombinant Human B7 1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/us11564999-299-0-6?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human b7 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    R&D Systems cd80
    FIGURE 1 Pre-engagement of Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab with soluble CTLA-4-Ig prevents CTLA4 binding to cell bound <t>CD80</t> or CD86 ligand. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. A fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble APC conjugated Abatacept was incubated on ice with a titration of soluble anti- CTLA-4 Abs to pre-engage CTLA-4 with anti-CTLA-4. This was added to DG75 B cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Cells were washed and analysed for Abatacept-ligand interaction by flow cytometry. All reagents were chilled on ice before use. (B) Representative concatenated FACS plots show impact of Abatacept-ligand engagement as the dose of anti-CTLA-4 Abs increased. (C) Anti-CTLA-4 doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab(Ipi) (Black line) and tremelimumab (Treme) (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates and data presented as mean +/- SD from 3 independent experiments.
    Cd80, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd80+fc+chimera/pm36119113-58-0-15?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    FIGURE 1 Pre-engagement of Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab with soluble CTLA-4-Ig prevents CTLA4 binding to cell bound CD80 or CD86 ligand. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. A fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble APC conjugated Abatacept was incubated on ice with a titration of soluble anti- CTLA-4 Abs to pre-engage CTLA-4 with anti-CTLA-4. This was added to DG75 B cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Cells were washed and analysed for Abatacept-ligand interaction by flow cytometry. All reagents were chilled on ice before use. (B) Representative concatenated FACS plots show impact of Abatacept-ligand engagement as the dose of anti-CTLA-4 Abs increased. (C) Anti-CTLA-4 doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab(Ipi) (Black line) and tremelimumab (Treme) (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates and data presented as mean +/- SD from 3 independent experiments.

    Journal: Frontiers in immunology

    Article Title: Impact of CTLA-4 checkpoint antibodies on ligand binding and Transendocytosis.

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871802

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 1 Pre-engagement of Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab with soluble CTLA-4-Ig prevents CTLA4 binding to cell bound CD80 or CD86 ligand. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. A fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble APC conjugated Abatacept was incubated on ice with a titration of soluble anti- CTLA-4 Abs to pre-engage CTLA-4 with anti-CTLA-4. This was added to DG75 B cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Cells were washed and analysed for Abatacept-ligand interaction by flow cytometry. All reagents were chilled on ice before use. (B) Representative concatenated FACS plots show impact of Abatacept-ligand engagement as the dose of anti-CTLA-4 Abs increased. (C) Anti-CTLA-4 doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab(Ipi) (Black line) and tremelimumab (Treme) (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates and data presented as mean +/- SD from 3 independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: CD80 (Cat# 10133-B1) and CD86 (Cat# 141-B2) -Ig expressing human IgG1 Fc were purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Incubation, Titration, Expressing, Cytometry, Transformation Assay

    FIGURE 2 Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab outcompete cell bound CD80 or CD86 for engagement with soluble CTLA-4-Ig. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. DG75 B cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP were mixed with a titration of soluble anti-CTLA-4 Abs. A fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble APC conjugated Abatacept was added to assess direct competition between soluble anti-CTLA-4 and cell bound ligand for Abatacept binding. Cells were incubated on ice, washed and Abatacept-ligand engagement analysed by flow cytometry. All reagents/cells were chilled on ice before use. (B) Concatenated FACS plots show reduced Abatacept-ligand engagement as the dose of anti-CTLA-4 Abs increased. (C) Anti- CTLA-4 doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates and data presented as mean +/- SD from 3 independent experiments.

    Journal: Frontiers in immunology

    Article Title: Impact of CTLA-4 checkpoint antibodies on ligand binding and Transendocytosis.

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871802

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 2 Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab outcompete cell bound CD80 or CD86 for engagement with soluble CTLA-4-Ig. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. DG75 B cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP were mixed with a titration of soluble anti-CTLA-4 Abs. A fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble APC conjugated Abatacept was added to assess direct competition between soluble anti-CTLA-4 and cell bound ligand for Abatacept binding. Cells were incubated on ice, washed and Abatacept-ligand engagement analysed by flow cytometry. All reagents/cells were chilled on ice before use. (B) Concatenated FACS plots show reduced Abatacept-ligand engagement as the dose of anti-CTLA-4 Abs increased. (C) Anti- CTLA-4 doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates and data presented as mean +/- SD from 3 independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: CD80 (Cat# 10133-B1) and CD86 (Cat# 141-B2) -Ig expressing human IgG1 Fc were purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Expressing, Titration, Binding Assay, Incubation, Cytometry, Transformation Assay

    FIGURE 3 Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab are unable to displace pre-engaged CTLA-4-Ig from cell bound CD80 or CD86. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. DG75 B cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP were pre-incubated on ice with a fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble APC conjugated Abatacept to pre-engage soluble CTLA-4 with ligand. Cells were washed, treated with a titration of soluble anti-CTLA-4 Abs and incubated on ice or at 37°C. Cells were washed and analysed for Abatacept-ligand engagement by flow cytometry. All reagents/cells were chilled on ice before use. (B) Concatenated FACS plots show Abatacept-ligand binding at different doses of anti-CTLA-4 Abs when incubated on ice or when incubated at 37°C. (C) Dose response curves for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line) presented as MFI CTLA-4-Ig binding from data shown in (B) Data presented are mean +/- SD from 3-6 independent experiments. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=3-6).

    Journal: Frontiers in immunology

    Article Title: Impact of CTLA-4 checkpoint antibodies on ligand binding and Transendocytosis.

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871802

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 3 Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab are unable to displace pre-engaged CTLA-4-Ig from cell bound CD80 or CD86. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. DG75 B cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP were pre-incubated on ice with a fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble APC conjugated Abatacept to pre-engage soluble CTLA-4 with ligand. Cells were washed, treated with a titration of soluble anti-CTLA-4 Abs and incubated on ice or at 37°C. Cells were washed and analysed for Abatacept-ligand engagement by flow cytometry. All reagents/cells were chilled on ice before use. (B) Concatenated FACS plots show Abatacept-ligand binding at different doses of anti-CTLA-4 Abs when incubated on ice or when incubated at 37°C. (C) Dose response curves for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line) presented as MFI CTLA-4-Ig binding from data shown in (B) Data presented are mean +/- SD from 3-6 independent experiments. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=3-6).

    Article Snippet: CD80 (Cat# 10133-B1) and CD86 (Cat# 141-B2) -Ig expressing human IgG1 Fc were purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Expressing, Incubation, Titration, Cytometry, Ligand Binding Assay, Binding Assay

    FIGURE 4 Pre-engagement of cell bound CTLA-4 with soluble CD80 and CD86Ig inhibits Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab from binding. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. Jurkat cells expressing CTLA-4 were pre-incubated on ice with either soluble CD80 or CD86Ig to pre-engage CTLA-4 with ligand. Cells were washed, incubated with a fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble PE conjugated anti-CTLA4 Abs and incubated on ice. Cells were washed and analysed for anti-CTLA-4-CTLA-4 binding by flow cytometry. All reagents/cells were chilled on ice before use. (B) Concatenated FACS plots show reduced anti-CTLA-4 engagement as the dose of CD80 or CD86Ig was increased. CD80 or CD86Ig doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fit using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (C) CD80 or CD86Ig doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=3).

    Journal: Frontiers in immunology

    Article Title: Impact of CTLA-4 checkpoint antibodies on ligand binding and Transendocytosis.

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871802

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 4 Pre-engagement of cell bound CTLA-4 with soluble CD80 and CD86Ig inhibits Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab from binding. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. Jurkat cells expressing CTLA-4 were pre-incubated on ice with either soluble CD80 or CD86Ig to pre-engage CTLA-4 with ligand. Cells were washed, incubated with a fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble PE conjugated anti-CTLA4 Abs and incubated on ice. Cells were washed and analysed for anti-CTLA-4-CTLA-4 binding by flow cytometry. All reagents/cells were chilled on ice before use. (B) Concatenated FACS plots show reduced anti-CTLA-4 engagement as the dose of CD80 or CD86Ig was increased. CD80 or CD86Ig doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fit using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (C) CD80 or CD86Ig doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=3).

    Article Snippet: CD80 (Cat# 10133-B1) and CD86 (Cat# 141-B2) -Ig expressing human IgG1 Fc were purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Expressing, Incubation, Cytometry, Transformation Assay

    FIGURE 5 Soluble CD80 and CD86Ig outcompete Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab for engagement with cell bound CTLA4. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. A fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble PE conjugated anti-CTLA4 Abs was pre-incubated with a titration of either soluble CD80 or CD86Ig on ice. Jurkat expressing CTLA-4 cells were added to facilitate direct competition between anti-CTLA4 Abs and CD80 or CD86Ig for cell bound CTLA-4 occupancy. Cells were incubated on ice, washed and anti-CTLA4-CTLA4 engagement analysed by flow cytometry. All reagents/cells were chilled on ice before use. (B) Concatenated FACS plots show reduced anti-CTLA-4-CTLA-4 engagement as the dose of CD80 or CD86Ig was increased. (C) CD80 or CD86Ig doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=3).

    Journal: Frontiers in immunology

    Article Title: Impact of CTLA-4 checkpoint antibodies on ligand binding and Transendocytosis.

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871802

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 5 Soluble CD80 and CD86Ig outcompete Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab for engagement with cell bound CTLA4. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. A fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble PE conjugated anti-CTLA4 Abs was pre-incubated with a titration of either soluble CD80 or CD86Ig on ice. Jurkat expressing CTLA-4 cells were added to facilitate direct competition between anti-CTLA4 Abs and CD80 or CD86Ig for cell bound CTLA-4 occupancy. Cells were incubated on ice, washed and anti-CTLA4-CTLA4 engagement analysed by flow cytometry. All reagents/cells were chilled on ice before use. (B) Concatenated FACS plots show reduced anti-CTLA-4-CTLA-4 engagement as the dose of CD80 or CD86Ig was increased. (C) CD80 or CD86Ig doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fitted using Prism v6 to obtain Log IC50 for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (D) Graphs show the mean IC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=3).

    Article Snippet: CD80 (Cat# 10133-B1) and CD86 (Cat# 141-B2) -Ig expressing human IgG1 Fc were purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Incubation, Titration, Expressing, Cytometry, Transformation Assay

    FIGURE 6 Soluble CD80 and CD86Ig are unable to displace pre-engaged Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab from cell bound CTLA-4. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. Jurkat cells expressing CTLA-4 were pre-treated with a fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble PE conjugated anti-CTLA-4 Abs on ice to pre-engage anti-CTLA-4-CTLA-4. Cells were washed and a titration of either soluble CD80 or CD86Ig was added. Cells expressing WT CTLA-4 were incubated on ice and cells expressing a non-internalising CTLA-4 mutant (Del 36) were incubated at either on ice or at 37°C. Cells were washed and analysed for anti-CTLA-4-CTLA-4 staining by flow cytometry. (B) Concatenated FACS plots showinganti-CTLA-4 binding at various doses of CD80 or CD86Ig (C) Dose response curves for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line) presented as MFI anti- CTLA-4 binding from data in (B) Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=3-6).

    Journal: Frontiers in immunology

    Article Title: Impact of CTLA-4 checkpoint antibodies on ligand binding and Transendocytosis.

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871802

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 6 Soluble CD80 and CD86Ig are unable to displace pre-engaged Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab from cell bound CTLA-4. (A) Schematic of experimental set-up. Jurkat cells expressing CTLA-4 were pre-treated with a fixed dose (2µg/ml) of soluble PE conjugated anti-CTLA-4 Abs on ice to pre-engage anti-CTLA-4-CTLA-4. Cells were washed and a titration of either soluble CD80 or CD86Ig was added. Cells expressing WT CTLA-4 were incubated on ice and cells expressing a non-internalising CTLA-4 mutant (Del 36) were incubated at either on ice or at 37°C. Cells were washed and analysed for anti-CTLA-4-CTLA-4 staining by flow cytometry. (B) Concatenated FACS plots showinganti-CTLA-4 binding at various doses of CD80 or CD86Ig (C) Dose response curves for ipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line) presented as MFI anti- CTLA-4 binding from data in (B) Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=3-6).

    Article Snippet: CD80 (Cat# 10133-B1) and CD86 (Cat# 141-B2) -Ig expressing human IgG1 Fc were purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Expressing, Titration, Incubation, Mutagenesis, Staining, Cytometry, Binding Assay

    FIGURE 7 Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab block CD80 and CD86 ligand loss for APC by transendocytosis. (A) CTV stained CHO cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP were cultured in the presence of CHO cells expressing CTLA-4 at a 1:1 ratio for 5 hours at 37°C. A titration of soluble ipilimumab (Black line) or tremelimumab (Blue line) were added at 0h. Percentage of CD80 or CD86-GFP ligand loss from CTV+ CHO cells by transendocytosis was determined by making the GFP MFI of CTV+ CHO cells relative to a negative control where no CTLA-4 was present. (B) Anti-CTLA-4 doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fit using Prism v6 to obtain Log EC50 for Iipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (C) Graphs show the mean EC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. (D-F) As in A, B & C except with CTLA-4 expressing Jurkat and CTV stained DG75 B cells expressing CD80 or CD86-GFP. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates, data presented as mean +/- SD from 3 independent experiments.

    Journal: Frontiers in immunology

    Article Title: Impact of CTLA-4 checkpoint antibodies on ligand binding and Transendocytosis.

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871802

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 7 Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab block CD80 and CD86 ligand loss for APC by transendocytosis. (A) CTV stained CHO cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP were cultured in the presence of CHO cells expressing CTLA-4 at a 1:1 ratio for 5 hours at 37°C. A titration of soluble ipilimumab (Black line) or tremelimumab (Blue line) were added at 0h. Percentage of CD80 or CD86-GFP ligand loss from CTV+ CHO cells by transendocytosis was determined by making the GFP MFI of CTV+ CHO cells relative to a negative control where no CTLA-4 was present. (B) Anti-CTLA-4 doses were Log(x) transformed and dose response curves fit using Prism v6 to obtain Log EC50 for Iipilimumab (Black line) and tremelimumab (Blue line). (C) Graphs show the mean EC50 with 95% confidence interval calculated using Prism v6. (D-F) As in A, B & C except with CTLA-4 expressing Jurkat and CTV stained DG75 B cells expressing CD80 or CD86-GFP. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates, data presented as mean +/- SD from 3 independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: CD80 (Cat# 10133-B1) and CD86 (Cat# 141-B2) -Ig expressing human IgG1 Fc were purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Blocking Assay, Staining, Expressing, Cell Culture, Titration, Negative Control, Transformation Assay

    FIGURE 8 Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab interfere with pre-established transendocytosis of CD80 and CD86 to prevent further ligand loss from APC. (A) CTV stained CHO cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP were cultured in the presence of CHO cells expressing CTLA-4 at a 1:1 ratio for 0, 3 or 6 hours at 37°C. Transendocytosis was established for 3 hours in the absence of anti-CTLA-4 Abs at which point soluble ipilimumab (dotted black line) or tremelimumab (dotted blue line) were spiked into culture. Transendocytosis was continued for a further 3 hours to observe the effect of anti-CTLA4 spike. Soluble anti-CTLA-4 antibodies were also added at timepoint 0h to block transendocytosis from the start of the assay (solid black – ipilimumab or blue – tremelimumab lines). Transendocytosis was also performed in the absence of anti-CTLA-4 treatment (Purple line). (B) % of CD80 or CD86-GFP ligand loss from CTV+ CHO cells by transendocytosis was determined by making the GFP MFI CTV+ CHO cells relative to a negative control where CTLA4 was not expressed (n=3). (C, D) As in A & B except with CTLA-4 expressing Jurkat and CTV stained DG75 B cells expressing CD80 or CD86-GFP cultured at a Jurkat:DG75 ratio of 2:1. Also an additional spike was performed at 6h and the assay was run for a total of 20h. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=2).

    Journal: Frontiers in immunology

    Article Title: Impact of CTLA-4 checkpoint antibodies on ligand binding and Transendocytosis.

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871802

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 8 Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab interfere with pre-established transendocytosis of CD80 and CD86 to prevent further ligand loss from APC. (A) CTV stained CHO cells expressing either CD80 or CD86-GFP were cultured in the presence of CHO cells expressing CTLA-4 at a 1:1 ratio for 0, 3 or 6 hours at 37°C. Transendocytosis was established for 3 hours in the absence of anti-CTLA-4 Abs at which point soluble ipilimumab (dotted black line) or tremelimumab (dotted blue line) were spiked into culture. Transendocytosis was continued for a further 3 hours to observe the effect of anti-CTLA4 spike. Soluble anti-CTLA-4 antibodies were also added at timepoint 0h to block transendocytosis from the start of the assay (solid black – ipilimumab or blue – tremelimumab lines). Transendocytosis was also performed in the absence of anti-CTLA-4 treatment (Purple line). (B) % of CD80 or CD86-GFP ligand loss from CTV+ CHO cells by transendocytosis was determined by making the GFP MFI CTV+ CHO cells relative to a negative control where CTLA4 was not expressed (n=3). (C, D) As in A & B except with CTLA-4 expressing Jurkat and CTV stained DG75 B cells expressing CD80 or CD86-GFP cultured at a Jurkat:DG75 ratio of 2:1. Also an additional spike was performed at 6h and the assay was run for a total of 20h. Data for ipilimumab and tremelimumab were acquired in separate 96-well plates (n=2).

    Article Snippet: CD80 (Cat# 10133-B1) and CD86 (Cat# 141-B2) -Ig expressing human IgG1 Fc were purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Staining, Expressing, Cell Culture, Blocking Assay, Negative Control